I was thinking about our discussion on my commute home this evening, and about Ellie’s comment / question about whether it is profitable to invest in protections and entitlements for labor. What Gilmore brings to this discussion is how the expansion of prisons is becoming a solution to a problem that was at one time viewed as the state’s socio-economic problems. She argues (1999:174) that this expansion of prisons is part of the state’s reorganization and restructuring of itself so that capitalist production in the U.S. is becoming more aligned with “supra-national trade” in a global political economy.
It is interesting to read what Gilmore writes about Angela Davis’ work. She notes how Davis (and others) argue that the (capitalist political-economic) system pose a limit to reform. Attempts to reform the system end up strengthening institutions rather than transforming them. As Gilmore (1999:183) explains, “At first, California planned simply to replace decrepit facilities with small (500 person) new ones. However, that plan never materialized. Instead, new power blocs (which took office in 1982 using a strategy similar to Nixon’s 1968 ‘law and order’ campaign) used the improvement plans as a template for the ‘megaprisons’ that have since been built.”
Here’s more you can read, if you are interested:
As I mentioned, Aihwa Ong’s work, Neoliberalism as Exception, lends support to the climate that Gilmore describes. Ong addresses how the terms of citizenship are altered by global capitalism. Mark Duffield’s work, Global Governance and the New Wars, traces a shift in discourses on “development” that is also connected to the global economy Gilmore describes.
Hi Prof.
In terms of formatting for the assignment, can we discuss each term/definition with one author. An example would be paragraph one discusses primitive accumulation and enclosure with Davis and paragraph two would discuss sexuality with a Schienbinger, etc. So our introduction paragraph would discuss and explain how oppression is sustained and created with each of the terms, and then we would expand on each term with the information provided by the author in each paragraph?
I just want to make sure its okay to separate the terms with specific authors or if we need to discuss the terms as applied to all three text sources.
Thank you!
Please Note: This writing assignment has been cancelled to give you extra time to study for the midterm exam this weekend.
Due Monday, March 13th, by midnight. Word count: 300 words. Please make sure everything is in your own words. Absolutely no quotes should be used. If you paraphrase from the text (from Rich’s work or anywhere else), you must be sure to include the proper citation (either MLA or APA).
In her chapter titled “Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence,” Adrienne Rich argues that heterosexuality is institutionalized. Drawing on the examples she introduces in her work, explain her characterization of this institutionality in relationship to the potential of feminist thought.
Hi Ellie,
Yes, this sounds like a good way to proceed: to begin by considering the relationship of the terms to the exam question and then using a single author to expand on a specific term.
You don’t need to address each term as it is used in all three sources. Do be sure you include a definition for each term. The more specific you can be about the way a specific author uses a term the better.
Elizabeth